City of Hudson, New York · Planning Board

Planning Board, Regular Meeting Draft

Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Length
1:25:03
Sections
12
Meeting type
Regular Meeting
Governing body
Planning Board

At a glance

Hudson's Planning Board welcomed its newest member, Nathan Bol, and said goodbye to Gabby Hoffman, who stepped down due to work commitments. The board approved site plans for Zoom Restaurant at 22 Park Place and gave a positive straw poll for GG's Wine Bar at 76 North 7th Street. The Foundry project at 724-726 Columbia Street cleared its environmental review and received site plan approval, subject to engineering conditions. Public hearings were scheduled for April 14th for two residential projects on North 4th Street and Columbia Street. The Hudson Housing Authority presented updated renderings for a major redevelopment of the Bliss Towers site into 166 affordable housing units, sparking detailed questions about phasing, demolition timelines, and zoning.

What happens next

Dates mentioned during the meeting. Confirm against the city's official calendar.

  • Tue, Apr 14Public hearing for GG's Wine Bar (76 North 7th Street) at 6 p.m.
  • Tue, Apr 14Public hearing for 405 Columbia Street at 6 p.m.
  • Tue, Apr 14Public hearing for 1416 North 4th Street at 6 p.m.
  • Tue, Apr 14Hudson Housing Authority returns with updated materials and responses to zoning questions
0101:27

Welcome and Announcements

Chair Bogle welcomed Nathan Bol as the board's newest member and thanked outgoing engineer Chris for his service. Gabby Hoffman announced her resignation from the board due to work commitments that will keep her away for much of the year.

Key points

  • Nathan Bol joins as the newest planning board member, serving as liaison to the Conservation Advisory Council
  • Gabby Hoffman resigned from the board due to work conflicts, after serving with passion and dedication
  • The board now has a full voting complement of members
  • Chris, the outgoing engineer, was thanked for his help during the transition of city administration
0204:25

Bills and Minutes Approval

The board approved an invoice from Barton & Loguidice for engineering services and approved the minutes from the February 10th meeting.

Key points

  • Invoice from Barton & Loguidice dated March 10th for $1,872 approved unanimously
  • Minutes from February 10th meeting approved without changes
0306:19

Escrow Release for Kites Project

The board approved releasing remaining escrow funds for a completed project after all conditions were met.

Key points

  • Project met all application conditions
  • Remaining escrow funds approved for release to applicant
  • Motion passed unanimously
0408:14

Escrow Policy Discussion

The board tabled discussion of an updated escrow policy after discovering the final document wasn't available to all members.

Key points

  • Updated escrow policy was prepared by staff to make the process more transparent
  • Policy includes structured thresholds: $2,500 for site plan reviews, $5,000 for projects 3,000-10,000 sq ft, $10,000 for larger projects
  • Document will be a contract signed by applicants
  • Final version wasn't distributed to all board members, so vote was tabled
Action Required

Board will vote on the escrow policy at a future meeting once all members have the final document

0512:21

22 Park Place (Zoom Restaurant) Final Approval

The board gave final site plan approval to Zoom Restaurant at 22 Park Place after completing environmental review and waiving the public hearing.

Key points

  • Classified as Type II action under State Environmental Quality Review, requiring no further environmental review
  • Public hearing waived by board vote
  • No referral to Columbia County Planning Board required (outside 500-foot threshold)
  • Final site plan approval granted, subject to payment of escrow fees
  • Applicant plans hummus restaurant with normal business hours
Complete

Project approved and ready to proceed with construction

0621:25

76 North 7th Street (GG's Wine Bar) Straw Poll

The board gave a positive straw poll for GG's Wine Bar, allowing the applicant to begin ordering supplies while waiting for final approval next month.

Key points

  • Applicant addressed parking concerns in February submission, showing 20 delineated spaces plus 8 additional spaces
  • County Planning Board meets tomorrow, referral expected back soon
  • Public hearing was waived at last meeting
  • Board indicated strong support in straw poll
  • Approval resolution will be ready for vote at April meeting
  • Applicant hopes to open in May
What's Next

Final approval vote scheduled for April 14th meeting

0723:43

724-726 Columbia Street (The Foundry) State Environmental Quality Review Review

The board conducted a detailed environmental review of The Foundry project, a multi-use development, ultimately issuing a negative declaration and approving the site plan.

Key points

  • Chair Bogle explained the State Environmental Quality Review process for new board members: state environmental quality review requires analyzing potential impacts
  • Board reviewed 11 criteria from Part 2 of the environmental assessment form
  • Only identified impact was increased water and sewer demand, which will be addressed through city sewer extension permit process
  • Project includes reuse of former tire warehouse as theater space with full insulation and soundproofing
  • Board adopted Parts 2 and 3 of environmental review unanimously
  • Negative declaration issued, finding no significant adverse environmental impacts
  • Final site plan approval granted, subject to satisfying all engineering comments and paying consultant fees
Complete

Project has site plan approval and can proceed once engineering conditions are met

0838:00

405 Columbia Street Public Hearing Scheduled

The board scheduled a public hearing for a project at 405 Columbia Street after reviewing minor engineering comment responses.

Key points

  • Project involves pavement replacement and some construction detail adjustments
  • Engineering comments were minor in nature and have been addressed
  • 16% increase in sewage outflow discussed, largely due to soil conditions and existing development
  • Public hearing scheduled for April 14th at 6 p.m.
0941:59

1416 North 4th Street Public Hearing Scheduled

The board scheduled a public hearing for a residential project on North 4th Street after reviewing updated plans.

Key points

  • Biggest revision was removing planned sidewalk extension on Prison Alley
  • No other major changes to site plan
  • Engineering comments addressed satisfactorily
  • Public hearing scheduled for April 14th at 6 p.m.
1043:46

360 State Street (Former Elementary School) Presentation

Applicant presented plans to convert the vacant former elementary school into 65 units of senior affordable housing with minimal site changes.

Key points

  • Building vacant since 2018, will be redeveloped for affordable senior housing
  • 65 units planned with 66 on-site parking spaces
  • No changes to building footprint, reusing existing utilities
  • Traffic will be significantly less than when it was a school
  • City Council served as lead agency for State Environmental Quality Review review, classified as Type I action
  • Environmental review already completed at city level
1147:00

Hudson Housing Authority Bliss Towers Redevelopment

The Housing Authority presented updated renderings for redeveloping the Bliss Towers site into 166 affordable housing units in two phases, sparking extensive discussion about phasing, demolition timelines, and zoning questions.

Key points

  • Project will replace existing 135 units with 166 new affordable units across two buildings plus six townhouses
  • Phase 1 builds new units first to allow resident relocation, Phase 2 demolishes existing Bliss and Columbia towers
  • Funding comes from state Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program through NYS Division of Housing
  • Phase 1 budget at maximum capacity, cannot include demolition costs without jeopardizing state funding
  • State committed to phased approach, Phase 2 funding expected within 2 years of Phase 1 completion
  • Design emphasizes townhouse-scale buildings lining streets, not tower-in-park model
  • Materials reference Hudson's vernacular: brick bases, siding, bay windows
  • State Street pedestrianization shown in renderings is aspirational for Phase 2, not guaranteed
  • Split zoning issue raised: property spans R-4 and GC districts, applicant claims GC applies to entire site
  • Engineering comments focused on zoning interpretation, setbacks, subdivision, and tying Phase 2 demolition to Phase 1 approval
Who spokeRaonda Smith · Hudson Housing Authority ChairDr. Jeffrey Datson · Hudson Housing Authority Executive DirectorJohn First · Land CounselQuincy Williams · Architect, Alexander Gorlin ArchitectsJohn Mateo · Executive VP, Malco
Zoning Uncertainty

Board requested written confirmation from Code Enforcement Officer on split-zone interpretation. Previous informal discussion needs formal documentation.

Open Questions
  • What guarantee exists that Phase 2 will be funded and Bliss demolished?
  • Can milestone deadlines be written into approval?
  • Will pedestrianization of State Street actually happen?
  • How will zoning interpretation be formally resolved?
1285:03

Adjournment

Chair Bogle thanked the Housing Authority team for their thorough presentation and acknowledged the challenge of presenting to a board with four new members. The meeting adjourned after 90 minutes.

Key points

  • Board will review Housing Authority materials over the next month
  • All new materials must be submitted two weeks before April 14th meeting, not the afternoon of
  • Chair acknowledged frustration of re-covering ground with new board members
  • Thanked applicants for transparency and direct responses to questions

About this page

FUTURE HUDSON is an experiment in civic engagement: every public meeting of the City of Hudson since January 2026, transcribed and made readable, so any resident can follow what the city is deciding without attending every meeting. This page covers one meeting; see the full archive.

How it was made

The meeting video was transcribed automatically; the transcript was then organized into sections and summarized. The raw transcript is above, every claim can be checked against it.

What to be skeptical of

The transcript is automated and contains speech-recognition errors; names and numbers may be wrong. This page has not been reviewed by a human. Nothing here is an official record, the city's official minutes are authoritative.